In order to strictly according to the principle of “Publicity, Fairness, Justice and Excellence, our faculty held a session of 2017 postgraduate national scholarship evaluation meeting in room 210 at 2 P.M. on Sept.15th. Thirteen members of the national scholarship judgment team served as the judges.

Before the reply, the college summarized the score of the academic achievements, scientific research and social work participating students according to document of the school and displayed them on the score table. This reply was divided into two groups, Ph.D and master degree. Nine candidates reported from the aspects of morality, scientific research, discipline competition, innovation and invention, social practice, social work and so on in less than 3 minutes. Each respondent made efforts to show himself in all aspects of learning and scientific research. The judges should objectively evaluate and score the respondent based on the principle of fairness and justice. Finally, the members of the panel also discussed the evaluation of academic scholarship of the 2016-2017 academic year of the college, aiming to be fair and impartial to confirm the achievements of each graduate student.

In order to guarantee the fairness and transparency of the review, the review adopt a live scoring record. The judges summarized the scores under the supervision and finally determine three master graduate students with highest scores and one doctoral graduate student. They will be noticed to the public and then submitted to the school as candidates.